We are in the 21st century and technology rules the world. This technology affects all aspects of our lives even down to the way we manage our cars and this has been driving a factor in a service which is known as fleet management service. But the main question pops up is what exactly fleet management is and what it is used for.
As the name suggests fleet management service is the service used for managing the fleet of vehicles. The main aim of fleet management service is to manage vehicles by using various tools so that operational efficiencies and effectiveness can be enhanced. In today's world, fleet management services have gained popularity and simultaniously also proved their worth and importance.
Fleet management service usually involves the application of APTS technologies. APTS technologies generally include computer software, various communications systems, and vehicle location technologies. Its main aim is to provide more effective planning, scheduling, and operations of transit vehicle fleets. According to the experts, fleet management service is also used as a term generally to encompass the management of all aspects which are primarily related to a company's vehicle fleet from the allocation of resources to fuel economies.
Talking about the prime function of fleet management service, its main area is the vehicle tracking component. This vehicle tracking component is generally GPS based, but sometimes it can be based on a Cellular triangulation platform too. It sounds complex and sophisticated but overall its easy to understand and also implement. And if you are using SupaTrak's fleet management service then you are certainly at the benefiting end. Another main function of fleet management service is the mechanical diagnostics. Current fleet management service includes advanced fleet management systems that can easily connect to the vehicle's on board computer, and gather data for the user.
Data collected can vary and it collects details such as mileage, fuel consumption, and much more, which are then collected into a global statistics scheme. Moreover, this fleet management service is also helpful in knowing driver behavior. Thus, by combining received data from the vehicle tracking system and the on board computer, it is possible to form a profile for any given driver. SupaTrak provides this technologically advanced fleet management service which incorporates all of the aforementioned elements and their associated benefits.
One key lesson in the Internet Marketing World of 2012 and beyond is that Less Means More. Don’t try too hard. Patience is a key asset in Social Media and Internet Marketing. But even with the best intentions of hard work, trial and your noble efforts for extension of knowledge, it’s easy to come unstuck. So let me share with you the lessons – and what NOT to do. No-one told me not to try a few things without reading five pages of rules and small-print. So this is what you need to know.
The Cardinal Rule Number One To Not Get Suspended From Twitter
Read their rules on aggressive following and how you cannot use affiliate links in programs.
The Cardinal Rule Number Two To Not Get Suspended From Twitter
Never use the @username reply to send a promotional message. They call it aggressive following and you can have your account suspended instantly. When you start a Twitter account this looks like a great way to message some high profile personalities, with High Following Numbers. But don’t even think about it – unless you have a really insightful reply on a theme that they seem to be tweeting passionately about. And when you reply to @username, jst don’t on any account, add any sort of promotional or affiliate link. You will be suspended for aggressive following before you can say ‘dead-in-the-water’!
Sometimes – on the same day that you set your account up – you may get an electronic ‘slap-on-the-wrists’ (that’s certainly what it feels like!) before you confirm the error of your ways and then they re-open your account. But the surest way to get de-activated and left in floating Twitter suspension land is to sent an unsolicited @username message with a promotional link.
Even worse, don’t upload tweets into a scheduler like Hootsuite or Socialoomph that are constructed in this way, with affiliate links – either shortened urls or the full affiliate coded ‘hoplinks’.
The Cardinal Rule Number Three To Not Get Suspended From Twitter
Working with affiliates looks very lucrative but beware of the biggest and most aggressive. They got there by scaling and promoting heavily. But often their links and landing pages have been blacklisted. Even if you use a URL shortener it doesn’t help. For some reason it often makes more affiliate links get bounced back and rejected. If you use it in a tweet – randomly when you get the moment to do it or formally through an upload scheduler – you can be suspended from Twitter in a heartbeat. Seriously. Then it can take you weeks, maybe months, of lobbying against automated email processes, to, jst occasionally get re-activated. But there seems no logic to How or When such a fortunate moment might happen. So heed the risk.
That’s also why you will notice, on the most spammy of emails from supposed ‘gurus’, they use intermediate connecting links through an autoresponder or hosting company.
The Cardinal Rule Number Four To Not Get Banned By Google AdWords
You guessed it. Avoid those aggressive links in your Pay Per Click Advertising Campaigns. If anything, you will find that Google are more unreachable and unyielding on this than Twitter are. Use a blacklisted link to an aggressive affiliate and Google AdWords will not just block it. They will stop your account. Even if you are running several completely innocent and compliant advertising campaigns. Then their auto email systems will drive you crazy.
Google even say that because you used a blacklisted affiliate link, then you are somehow associated with the company behind it. So they tell you to get that affiliate to make their landing page compliant, even though you clearly have absolutely no control over the affiliate’s company or their web activities!
So stay very patient. Keep your web promotional activity passive and conservative. Check all the affiliate and promotional links that you are using with real diligence before you jeopardize your relationship with those Web Giants that you cannot do without.
Save Money – Help the Ecology – Slow Down the Oil Wars – Save the Planet. How? It's never been easier.
Here's how. Make your own electricity – not just for your house, for the power grid and your next car.
Ever ask "Why Can not We Buy Solar or Wind Generator Kits?" You would think it would be easy to buy and
easy to install them by now. Here's why. They are not enough enough for the big companies to sell them yet. When will they be popular? When YOU request them.
There are 4 major corporations listed below that should sell these kits – with their internet contact form
addresses listed below. When should you contact them? Now. Because the longer you wait, the more money, ecology and lives are wasted. I sent this paragraph to the four major corporations contact pages: "I will be running articles in several online publications this next few weeks on buying electric generator kits for the grid – either from solar panels, windmills or solar-steam generation. offer these for sale to the public? I will try to print your responses. – Arthur Browning "You should send a message too.
Certainly there are many companies offering many solar, wind, and water systems to generate electric power. But in all honesty, most Americans do not want to make a lot of decisions about technical applications and which equipment to buy for which approach. Nor do most Americans want the major expense or replacing there current system. Most Americans would like, like a simple kit to generate electricity directly to the grid – run their electric meter backwards – to save money.
Sure a lot of people have done this, but a simple and inexpensive kit that is readily available at a major
outlet insures that the many people who want to save money, ecology and lives can do it. The kit can be less expensive than a riding mower and easier to hook up than a computer, perhaps a service technician to mount on the power line.
What does it do for the corporations? It generates profit, increases share value, provides positive image,
and helps save you and this world from severe energy problems. Think about it – but not too long.
US + computers + helping developing nations + big opportunity = No Microsoft. Now how could that equation possibly be? Try Negroponte who is in the news again with his One Laptop Per Child Non-Profit that is going to help decrease the Digital Divide between first and third world nations. He is the guy who co-founded the MIT Media Lab in 1985 with his well-spoken commentary on how the laboratory, spending $ 25 million a year (reaching $ 40 million by 2003), is engineering the merger of newspapers, television, entertainment, learning , and computers. (Wired 3.08 1995). Mr. Negroponte is the man touting a $ 100 computer for the masses. If his work over the last 10 years at MIT is to be reality and the world of consumerism is to continue to permeate every nook and cranny of even the poorest gains of the earth then he better damn well be ready to get $ 100 computers in the hands of all those potential consumers, uh I mean children, in third world nations who wake up every morning with their first priority finding enough food to eat to survive just one more day.
Negroponte, not to be confused with his early 1980's Nicaragua Contra orchestrating, despot corrupt government backing, illegal arms for contras directing and international drug traffic ignoring brother John (although he crashes at his place from time to time), Nicholas, also the son of Dimitri, the Greek Shipping Magnate, has had a respectable academic career in technology. He has successfully leveraged his elite upbringing and spent nearly 4 decades at MIT where he founded and ran MIT Media Lab, a large technology department in one of America's elite education institutions until 2000. His inside contacts have put him in the position of being able to Capitalize on some very interesting start up companies including including Zagats, Wired Ambient Devices, and Skype (the latter having just been bought for a cool $ 2.6 Billion in a deal worth potentially $ 4 Billion over time). He also has managed to form some very interesting alliances in his new quest to get the integration of news, television, entertainment, learning & computers. His One Laptop Per Child partners include Google, Advanced Micro Devices, News Corp., Red Hat and Brightstar? Anyways, does this lineup look like anything familiar? Perhaps you could call it 21st Century Global Domination the Negroponte way. Or although you could say, having developing governments purchase $ 100 computers for their children who currently receive about $ 24 per year in health care or $ 45 per year in education is a good thing. Well for some reason the World Bank or UN do not think this a top priority. The Bank puts Education, Health and Water on top.
Having illiterate people who's only "economy" is producing, finding or slaving for enough food to stay alive each day get their hands on a $ 100 PC seems a bit more of an intellectual feel good story than any kind of useful benefit. I mean I do not want to get in the way of some coffee induced self contained intellectual mental orgasm of what the future looks like in their techno centric view of the world but a more practical view would be presented by Sadruddin Aga Khan in his article in AL-AHRAM, Cairo, "The fact remains, however, that 80 countries now have fewer incomes lower than they were a decade ago, and the number of people living in poverty (those who earn less than $ 1 a day) is stuck stubbornly at 1.2 billion, while those listening less than $ 2 per day number almost 3 billion. " Did I say 3 billion? Is not that like the the planet?
Meanwhile, back in the US some elites with some tech savvy media heads have decided they better get 21st century television in front of 21st century consumers ASAP. Did I say that correctly? Back in 1996-1998, I taught disappointed children aged 2.5 to 5 years old using a lug around desktop computer with an x486 processor and 4x CD ROM and some $ 19.95 (often purchased with $ 10 rebates) education games. Yes, while most children could pick up a mouse and click, to help children forgive the subject matter or even have some idea of what the objective was, I had to incorporate a lot of traditional flashcards and TLC and I was able to get those children to read and write before Kindergarten. The developed world is throwing away enough computers every day that could be collected, shipped to the developing world to be beaten down, and reloaded with free software and educational games that could provide the basis for educating children using computer technology just like I did. They would not need to be connected to any network, only have a reliable source of power. They may not make great marketing recipients but if developing countries could find enough teachers who knew how to teach with a computer, one computer could easily serve 50 children in the primary school years.
Which brings us to another point, while Negroponte may have corporate sponsors initially helping to subsidize the purchase, who is going to help provide the training of the persons to provide the training to the children, the deployment and maintenance of the devices and the development of their infrastructure? Certainly not our US Government. Although US aid to Africa from FY 2000 (the last full budget year of the Clinton Administration) to FY 2004 increased 56%, more than half of the Aid to Africa consists of Emergency food aid than overseas development assistance, which contributes to sustainable development . The reminder of the increase is compromised primarily of funding for the President's HIV / AIDS initiative as well as emergency and post conflict assistance to Liberia and Sudan (The Brookings Institution, US Foreign Assistance to Africa).
The best solution would be to implement in all of the developed world something similar to what the European Union (EU) is doing right this moment, forcing the "take back" and recycling of EVERY electronic gadget that requires power to function. Now if the manufactures of computers (and other personal electronic devices like cell phones, pda's etc.) were required to take the old one back as the EU is suggesting, there would immediately be a full stock of products to pick from. If there was a collection fee not unlike a recyclable bottle plan, the fee you pay for tire disposal, the crazy fees you pay on your cell phone for "universal service" funds, or the ever increasing "tax" to pay for security and landing services at airports applied to the purchase of that new PC, think of the possibilities. You would get a packing slip to send back your old machine. That would be shipped to a depot where companies would be contracted to choose what to recycle (ie; strip of hazardous or valuable metals etc and recycle or scrap the rest) or what could be sent to refurbishing depots established in developing countries. These depots in developing countries would serve as training centers to educate and train people to disassemble the computers, test, configure and load free operating systems and do whatever else is necessary to prep them for resale at subsidized rates to their people, education institutions, governments businesses etc.
They could also set up recycling operations for the scrap steel and plastic from the housings and other parts and to strip the value metals such as copper, lead, gold and other metals for use or export back to the developed world. All of this would work under the auspices of "recycling" unwanted electronic products from the developed world instead of filling our landfills as we do in the ignorant and insane disposable mentality we have in the US. Who knows? This may even create computer programmers capable of programming open source code that could further tailor the computers to the local market. The program may even start a cottage industry of entrepreneurs that would give local corporations and government agencies a source of expertise and more independence managing their technology resources. Perhaps some local ownership of this kind of technology could result in other businesses able to afford to purchase their own technology and employ it to be more productive and expand their operations. What really matters is giving countries that are 3-4 generations behind the technology cycle something to start with even if it is the discarded technology of the developed world.
Starting with a $ 100 wireless 'PC' for the masses with nothing else in place to make use of the thing seems something of a pipe dream that if implemented would simply sap the governments and then the people of their country of scarce resources that could go towards helping their population learn, stay healthy and survive. But what a great story. What better media attention and money raising antic than to give all those educated techno centric intellectuals something to make them sleep better at night.